On 7 January 2015 at about 11:30 local time, two brothers, Saïd and Chérif Kouachi, forced their way into the offices of the French satirical weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris. Armed with rifles and other weapons, they killed 12 people and injured 11 others. The gunmen identified themselves as belonging to the Islamist terrorist group Al-Qaeda’s branch in Yemen, which took responsibility for the attack.

Some believe the United States Government did it- according to Infowars, the US government may have taken a break from planning the next ‘Benghazi’ to sponsor the Charlie Hebdo killers. French conspiracy theorist Thierry Meyssan questioned who ordered the attacks on Hebdo? Good question! Meyssan went on to point out that the Kouachi brothers’ actions differ from a close-read interpretation of a jihadist theory. “We should consider all assumptions and admit that at this stage, its most likely purpose is to divide us, and its sponsors are most likely in Washington.” Meyssan isn’t the only one to be invested in this theory- the front page of a popular Russian tabloid published yesterday asked, “Did the Americans plan the Paris terror attacks?” The Telegraph writes that this is just one example of a number of conspiracy theories regarding the attack and the U.S. government that have come out of Russia in recent days.

Other theorists have conspired that the Israeli intelligence service planned the Charlie Hebdo attack. Melih Gokcek, the mayor of the Turkish city Ankara, said that he believed Israel was behind the shooting in order to boost enmity towards Islam. “Mossad is definitely behind such incidents,” Gokcek said, according to the Financial Times. He also drew parallels between France’s move sot recognise a Palestinian state and the attack.

Evidence suggests that the attackers who killed 12 people had targeted the magazine because of its history of publishing cartoons aggravating enmity towards/about Islam and Muslims. The likelihood that an Islamic terror group is responsible hasn’t stopped some people from suggesting that Israel is somehow responsible- the International Business Times India published this piece blaming the Israeli spy agency Mossad:

“Although there is no way to verify the claims that Mossad was involved, the backdrop in which the attack took place seems to indicate that they might be involved, many conspiracy theorists have noted. Mossad is responsible for intelligence collection and has undertaken many covert operations for Israel in Europe that aim to further their Jewish cause.”

The site has since taken the article down, saying it ‘should never have been published.’ Meanwhile, even less-reputable voices, like that of Kevin Barrett (“the world’s leading Muslim 9/11 truth activist”), alleges the attack was an Israeli “false flag.”

On the 9th January 2015, Francois Hollandais, the then President of France made an incredible national televised broadcast where he had made the following statement, “Those who have committed these actions, these terrorists, these illuminati, have nothing to do with Islam”. (‘Ceux qui ont commis ces actes, ces terroristes, ces illuminés, ces fanatiques, n’ont rien à voir avec la religion Muslim’).
This was just two days after the Paris terror attacks on the satirical newspaper- Charlie Hebdo. Even with this shocking claim by the French president, our zionist-controlled mainstream media do not report on this or inform us of who is really behind these attacks.

A police informant who was arrested in the case of the attack on Charlie Hebdo in Paris, Claude Hermant, has implicated the French state in the preparation of the attack. Hermant, who allegedly sold weapons used by Amédy Coulibaly and the Kouachi brothers to commit the attacks, claims that three gendarme military policemen and two customs officials, as well as organized crime circles, were involved. The case shatters the official narrative, according to which terror attacks in France, Belgium, and Germany since 2015 have been the work of isolated Islamists.

Hermant’s lawyer, Maxime Moulin, does not dispute the fact that weapons that passed through the hands of his client, who was acting for the customs’ intelligence agency until 2013 and then worked for the gendarmerie, reached Coulibaly. The media and established political parties covered up this fact, together with Hermant’s arrest after the attacks due to his relations with Coulibaly. The interior minister in 2015, Bernard Cazeneuve, even invoked the states secrets privilege in regard to investigations of the relations between Hermant and the Islamists. According to the daily Libération, Moulin justified his client’s suit by citing “a Médiapart article of March 2017”. Claude Hermant had warned the gendarmerie that a convoy with weapons was passing through the toll booths on the Lille to Paris highway, but the gendarmerie only succeeded in intercepting half of the vehicles. The second convoy, which had been warned that the gendarmes had been alerted, managed to evade them. And those weapons were used by Coulibaly.

The Voix du Nord daily published a few extracts of emails exchanged between Hermant and a gendarme in November 2014: “Hey Claude, we talked it over with our superiors… We’re giving you a green light for the two cases you showed us (weapons—[the city of]Charleroi) ..” These emails suggest that Hermant may have received official approval from some intelligence agency for his actions in the Coulibaly-Kouachi affair.


It is clear that far broader forces besides a few Islamist networks were involved in the processes that led up to the attacks. The government’s recourse to the states secrets privilege and the deafening silence of the major media has produced a false and one-sided narrative of the attacks, which incites anti-Islamic racism and whitewashes the role of the state and far right.

The attacks served to justify former President François Hollande’s shift towards relations with far-right forces—with the state of emergency, creating a new ‘national guard’ police agency, the electronic spying law, and legitimizing neo-fascism by inviting National Front leader Marine Le Pen to the Elysée presidential palace.

The 2015 attacks were carried out by Islamist networks known and followed by French intelligence, who were using them as foot soldiers in the NATO war in Syria. The Kouachi brothers, Coulibaly, and the leader of the November 13th attack squad, Abdelhamid Abaaoud, were all known to the intelligence services for their ties to Al Qaeda or the Islamic State (IS) militia.

Commentary on these various attacks by the media and the established political parties was manipulated in order to terrorize the public and push the political atmosphere further and further to the right. The media and the political establishment reacted to the murder of the policeman, Xavier Jugelé, with law-and-order hysteria that cut across rising antiwar and anti-austerity sentiment among youth and workers after the April 7 US strikes in Syria.

Emmanuel Macron, the preferred candidate of the dominant factions of the ruling class, was falling in the polls as Jean-Luc Mélenchon rose. The attack served to shift the political and media atmosphere to the right, stabilizing Macron and the neo-fascist candidate Marine Le Pen in the polls. The state of emergency is not aimed at the terrorists, but to suspend democratic rights and undertake unpopular policies through repression of opposition, as during the police attacks on last year’s protests against the labor law and the arbitrary searches and seizures in immigrant suburbs. With the attacks being clearly looking like an ‘inside job’; it also appears that the government has always traditionally alluded to the Masonic orders which are very strong in France, to a hidden elite of Judeo-Masonic bankers.

Israel is behind such incidents. The duplicity of the west is obvious: As Muslims we have never sided with terror or massacres:racism, hate speech, Islamophobia are behind these massacres…. The culprits are clear: French citizens undertook this massacre and Muslims were blamed for it.” He linked the attacks to French moves towards recognising Palestine.“Games are being played throughout the Islamic world” he said.


Again, the Rothschild banking family are connected to yet another conspiracy as according to the Dutch business magazine “Quote“, they had revealed the Rothschild’s took over the French satirical magazine ‘Charlie Hebdo’. According to the magazine, there have been discussions about the acquisition of the publishing company and ultimately a takeover was planned.

Charlie Hebdo was founded by a mixture of anarchists and socialists. It certainly did not shy away from mocking jewish people to the point it was often accused of anti-semitism. Prior to the takeover, the magazine had opposed militarism and had often portrayed Israel as fascist and evil. However, the purchase of Charlie Hebdo was a controversial subject within the Rothschild family,  as a member of the family, Baron Philippe de Rothschild, had stated the following in an interview with “The Quote”.

“There were some serious objections to the takeover from my uncle Baron Edouard de Rothschild. Some relatives wanted to block the purchase because that would make us a political force in the media . We want to avoid this at all costs. We have nothing to do with politics. Ultimately, the critics in the family were overruled.”

It has been reported that Madame Rothschild, aka Ellie Katsnelson, who fell out with family after traumatic events during her childhood that included the mystery around the death of her mother in the Swiss Alps during 1989; had written an email to someone with the alias; Lasha Darkmoon, where some shocking information was revealed. “Not only do I believe that the Paris circus was not done by the Muslims, I actually know for a certainty that it was not. Muslims had nothing — I repeat, nothing — whatever, to do with the carnage that took place in Paris last week,” she reportedly said. And… “This whole event was organized in Brussels. Even Ahmed Merabet, the first French policeman purporsefully shot dead, is actually not a Muslim at all. His real name is Avigdor, and his brother’s name is Maloch, recently changed to Melek – all of them crypto-Jews in the service of Israeli intelligence, i.e., Mossad agents.” “Avigdor is in Buenos Aires right now, and will remain there for six years, a standard operating procedure with those deep in Israeli psyops. After this he will resurface with a new identity, by which time of course the populace will have forgotten all about the Paris attacks.”

According to “Quote”, Philippe de Rothschild has had a majority stake in the newspaper chain. Prior to the attacks the magazine was selling only tens of thousands, and after, they managed to sell within the region of 7 million. From the available evidence, it appears that the Rothschilds made a lot of money from the takeover of Charlie Hebdo- -whilst being in the involvement of an orchestrated attack on Paris at the same time.

I strongly believe the Rothschilds and Israel itself was behind this atrocious planned attack and would not come as much of a shock as I know Israel was directly involved in the attack on the World Trade Centers on September 11th, 2001. And again- they had blamed Muslims for that attack as well.